Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Now that you're all caught up, get out there and start playing!
I managed to squeeze in a screening of the animated anthology Fear(s) of the Dark last night at The Royal. I’m glad to report that Fear(s) was worth the stiff back I am suffering from today. I often forget how punishing those old seats can be. How did I ever manage to get through Inland Empire in ’07 without serious injury? But I digress. It is difficult to describe Fear(s) as the stories within are not named and are fragmented between a pair of wraparound devices. It was put together by a group of contemporary graphic artists and the narrative led me to believe Fear(s) is meant as a single tapestry rather than an anthology, but you can take it as either.
During the first full story (from Charles Burns) about a shy bookworm in a relationship for which the term ‘unhealthy’ was invented, I was immediately struck by the familiar art style. After racking my brain, it finally came to me that Burns was the guy who wrote Black Hole, a graphic novel that’s been staring at me from my bookshelf since last year, yet still remains unread. His Fear(s) story was cool, in an Outer Limits kind of way. The second story (by Marie Caillou) that focuses on a young Japanese girl stuck in a bad dream is pretty effed up. Caillou’s work is known for its strong Japanese influence and it is evident here as many themes I
see often in films from the Far East are revisited here. They are a strange bunch; and that’s why I love them so. The third story (by Lorenzo Mattotti) about a small village besieged by an unknown creature is probably the most straightforward of the group. It had an old school sketchbook style that made it standout from the rest. The last and my favourite of the bunch (by Richard McGuire) follows a lone traveller taking refuge from a snowstorm in a creaky old house. It excellently uses shadow and light, rather than words, to tell the story and I was into it the whole way. The graphic style
was similar to that of the 2006 sci-fi flick Renaissance. The sound design – which is fabulous throughout all of Fear(s) – really excels here. Pierre Disciullo and Blutch orchestrated the two wraparound bits of the movie. I wasn’t too struck on Disciullo’s voice-over philosophizing, but Blutch’s piece featuring the old man terrorizing the countryside with his pack of dogs had an interesting look to it, kind of like those old Mystery! intros.
What happened next was... unexpected.
I saw a commercial for this little television experiment while watching Dollhouse (yes, I'm still clinging on) this week. It's called Harper's Island and has been described as "Scream meets Ten Little Indians". It is a nine-episode murder mystery that begins April 9th and goes through until July 2nd. Although the trailer doesn't really do it any favours, I applaud CBS for trying something different with this. I saw some familiar faces like Bill Pullman and Cameron Richardson there, so it does have some cred to it. It's been a while since Primetime has had a Twin Peaks-style mystery for us to mull over and I hope that it, at least, makes for some engaging television. Click here for the promo.
Back up, gentlemen. Back the fuck up.


Shatner vs. killer tarantulas = Cinematic gold!

Helen Shaver should have really got that thing checked out.
You know what I’m talking about.
Sharon Stone has a paralyzing encounter with a spider.
A dark cellar and a lot of beetles. You figure it out.
“I have a message for you, and I don’t think you are going to like it!”

I was interested in seeing this gene-manipulation fable anyway because I like Natali's work and I went to high school with one of the film's stars (Brandon McGibbon), but after these pics, I am really amped up. Talk about DARK shit! That second one kind of reminds me of the vampire design in 30 Days Of Night... and also that infamous Playstation commercial by Chris Cunningham.
YouTube Is A Strange Place.
Have you ever just randomly watched videos on YouTube? There is some crazy shit out there. Things can get even more out there, if you start clicking on related videos. It's like following the yellow brick road... if it were paved with souls and wasted time and led to hell. Take this path for example.
Exhibit A? This really creepy commercial for Orville Redenbacher.
WTF thought this was a good idea? It would be like digging up Walt Disney - sorry, UNFREEZING Walt Disney - to shlep their newest picture. Since when do zombies make good spokespeople? So, then I saw a stange sight on the right column, clicked on it and came up with this Exhibit B.
Does this clip really need to be almost two minutes long? Creeeeeeeepy. But not as creepy as Exbihit C.
All I can say is thank God it's only four seconds. I wonder if Chris Cunningham has seen that? And last, but certainly not least is Exhibit D.
I have so many questions for this dude. First of all, WHY???!!! And second, how did you figure out you could do that? I had to get off the YouTube train there for the sake of my sanity. Well, that and it was five o' clock and time to go home.
That's all for this week. Have a great Sunday.
