In addition to the usual reviews and comments you would find on a horror movie blog, this is also a document of the wonderfully vast horror movie section of the video store I worked at in my youth.
Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

September Horror Trivia Watchlist.


To all those who came here from the event or the Trivia FB page, welcome! I am Jay, one half of the horror trivia quizmasters and this is my humble blog. Here's a selected list of titles mentioned at the last event. Click on the titles to be redirected to their Imdb listing. Horror Trivia Night happens at Storm Crow Manor in Toronto. If you're in the area, come on down! Register here.

From Hell (2001)
Session 9 (2002)

The Guest (2014)
Detention (2011)

The Mist (2007)

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Stand Rant Below aka TL/DR

As you may have noticed, reviews of horror media have been scarce over the last year. To be honest, it has been due to a lack of inspiration and not that I haven't been absorbing noteworthy content. Bly Manor and The Last of Us Part II were extremely treasured experiences for me last year, but I was not able to type through the funk that has hung over me for what seems like ages. Until now;


The Stand show recently finally became available to Canadians through Amazon Prime and the day after I finished on Mikey's shoot I binged it in one sitting. Before I get to that though, a little history.

Stephen King's The Stand was the first novel I ever read and still remains my favourite book. In my teenage years, it was essentially my bible and I could even recite some passages from memory. Decades later, even the smallest details (like Stu's Guinea pig roommate while in captivity was named Geraldo) are still rattling around in my brain. I haven't revisited the 1994 mini-series since my original watch, but I remember being lukewarm on it. It was a serviceable adaptation, but it just really felt sanitized for network television. Up to this point, I think the best representation was the comic series a decade back.


A well weathered copy.


So now you may understand why I had to battle through and just put my thoughts of this newest adaptation to digital paper. Onward and upward!

First off, was I happy with Josh Boone's go at it? Overall, not really. So many odd choices constantly took away from my enjoyment of the show, but let me try and break it down.

In any adaptation, dealing with the changes to the source material is just a fact of life. However, what irks me is when said changes detract from the experience. Paramount of these for me was the disjointed structure. The Stand lends itself to a linear narrative, as it's all about character arcs. If a character's journey goes from A to Z, and you start at M unnecessarily, it affects it as a whole. Two examples of this are how Harold Lauder (Owen Teague) and Nick Andros (Henry Zaga) are treated in this series.

I think a huge misstep was making Harold the entry point in the story (and not James Marsden's Stu who is the obvious everyman – his name is literally RED MAN) and seemingly attempting to make him a sympathetic character. The whole invented bit about saving Frannie (Odessa Young) from suicide was another gaffe that encouraged the idea that she owed him something. This is not only annoying, but also a little tone deaf. Perhaps the bigger crime was the neutering of Nick's character. He was one of the book's main protagonists and his eventual sacrifice was one of its most shocking moments. Here, he was basically just given a few scenes and his death doesn't land because of it.


Harold Lauder, horror's first incel?


But it wasn't all bad, as strong casting choices were Stu, Fran, Glen (Greg Kinnear), Tom (Brad William Henke), Mother Abigail (though considering Whoopi Goldberg had been waiting thirty years to play this role I would hope so) and, for the most part, Larry (Jovan Adepo), although more on that last one in a bit. I first wanted to touch on the handling of the Captain Trips superflu itself. Making everything all take place over a shorter amount of time and have our character's introduced while the outbreak was happening around them was a smart choice – and a prophetic one considering those early days of Covid-19. Hamish Linklater's appearance as a renamed Dr. Ellis was the first time I thought “oh, things are looking up” during my watch through. And points for the King and Mick Garris cameos, they made me chuckle.



One of my favourite sections of the book is Larry's escape from New York, but this version glazed over a lot of that too. It started decently with him dealing with his dying mother and his conversation with the “Yankee yanker” – though he by no means should have been a replacement for the Monster-Shouter – but past his great first interaction with Rita Blakemoor (Heather Graham) it goes awry. When I visited NYC, I made sure to drive through the Lincoln Tunnel because that was how much that section of the book affected me. Presumably for budgetary reasons, this whole bit was replaced by regular old sewers. It was kind of like being sold Jason Takes Manhattan and getting Jason on a boat in Vancouver instead. Wait, what am I saying? Jason 8 is still great. This, not so much. Also, Rita's death was reduced to her lamenting in the rain, as opposed to the nightmare fuel of the book. 



More tragic is the curtailing of Larry & Nadine's relationship. Forget the fact that their meeting was cut down to a ten-second flashback, it's that there isn't enough material to properly set up their last scene together in Boulder. I do want to preface this by saying that Amber Heard's portrayal of Nadine was one of my faves in this series and a lot of it was due to her actually being given a decent amount of screen time, just unfortunately not with Larry. The complete omission of Lucy Swann doesn't really give Larry any reason to not accept Nadine's advances. Sure, you could make a case that he had moved on and he did have something he needed to do right that second, but on the other hand, if Amber Heard is on your doorstep and ready to go...


The defense rests.


That's enough about the Boulder Free Zone, let's move West to New Vegas and a whole new set of grievances. I was talking to a friend a few days before about the show and he had heard that people were saying Alex SkarsgĂ„rd was miscast as Randall Flagg. I'd say he was the least of this show's problems and a damn-sight better than the mulleted Jamey “rub-a-dub-dub-thanks-for-the-grub” Sheridan from Garris' version. I actually thought the idea of Flagg taking power from the fear of his followers was one of the few interesting slants that this show posed.

I had more of an issue with some of the Dark Man's underlings. Nat Wolff's portrayal of Lloyd was far more flamboyant than necessary. I get the idea of someone being in over their head, but there needed to be a level of restraint (more like Miguel Ferrer's turn in the mini-series) as everyone else was off the charts, namely the actresses crushing as Julie Lawry and the gender swapped Rat-woman (Katharine McNamara and Fiona Dourif respectively). Though nothing was more cringe-worthy than the show's treatment of The Trashcan Man (Ezra Miller) who was essentially boiled down to a Gollum-like entity.

As for New Vegas itself, the higher production value made the landscape impressive and there were several scenes showing the debauchery of its citizens, but later occurrences flew in the face of this setup. These denizens were apparently okay with public crucifixions, but then horrified when Flagg beat Bobby Terry (Clifton Collins Jr.) to death and Lloyd executed Glen. You can't have it both ways, guys. I also wasn't real sweet on Nadine's exit either. Admittedly, the Hand of God climax was less clumsy than the mini-series, but I'm not sure we needed to see Flagg dance.



So, the story ended, but there was still one episode left. It turns out there's a new epilogue written by Stephen King for the show. I swear, you give him any opportunity and he'll just keep adding and adding. This last episode, which mainly features Stu and Fran going back to Maine, doesn't really need to be there, but I can appreciate wanting to give Fran her moment in the sun and an opportunity to interact with the Dark Man. I did like those scenes between them.

I think that's the meat and potatoes of it. I wanted to like this, but I think I'm just too married to the source material. As I said before, I'm okay with cutting out bits like The Kid (who I hear was originally supposed to be Marilyn Manson so excellent call in hindsight) and Ray Flowers, but when you interfere with the actual DNA of the story, you SCROOOOOOOWED IT UP!

Wednesday, March 10, 2021

it Came From The Archives 31.2

Hey all! Today's archives clippings feature articles and interviews with some of horrors greatest icons. Behold! Click images to enlarge.









Those Freddy articles crack me up. Innocent times when we still believed each subsequent horror sequel was absolutely, definitely, certainly, for sure the last one. As for Robert Englund's “Freddy-less future”, I'm sure he wasn't sweating it.

Tomorrow, I wrap things up with some random clippings and release posters from various nineties releases.

To further dive into the archives, click here

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

Sometimes Meme Is Better...

 
I find this especially hilarious because it reminds me of the time I wrote a book report on Pet Sematary in Grade 8 and the teacher docked me for spelling Sematary wrong.

So Mrs. McKay, wherever you are, go fuck yourself.

Art by @robzombieportraits

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Mickey, The Walkin' Dude.

These responses below to Disney World's reopening announcement are hilarious.





You're welcome!

Saturday, November 9, 2019

The Doctor Is In!


Danny (Tony) says go see Doctor Sleep this weekend. It rules.

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

...makes Jim a dull boy.

Newest on the list of scary good deepfake videos is this one cribbing Kubrick's masterpiece The Shining.



I wonder. What is it about The Shining that makes it such fertile ground for fan videos? 

Monday, April 15, 2019

Podcastin'

I guested on the newest episode of the podcast The Boys Who Would Be Critics where we discussed the new Pet Sematary movie, as well as some other fun King adaptations of yore. Check it out below if you feel so inclined.


Friday, April 12, 2019

Back To Jerusalem.


This week's flick is Larry Cohen's 1987 vampire flick A Return to Salem's Lot.


An anthropologist (Michael Moriarty) and his son (Ricky Reed) visit an quiet Maine town not realizing it is populated by vampires.

I've been watching a lot of old Stephen King movie adaptations lately in preparation for a podcast I'm sitting in on this weekend. I'd never seen the Tobe Hooper-helmed teleplay either so I had to seek that out, as well. That's almost five hours of Salem's Lot and I was pretty happy with the ride.

Michael Moriarty in A Return to Salem's Lot.

As one might expect, the differences between the two iterations are vast. Hooper's take was a TV miniseries and though it would've been revolutionary in 1979, it's pretty tame by today's standards. I did chuckle at the nods to Texas Chainsaw and that scene where Danny (Brad Savage) was floating outside his brother's window was creepy as hell. There's so much of it that oozed into the vampire films of the next decade like The Lost Boys and Fright Night. I also couldn't help but think of Evil Dead while watching that aforementioned scene, as well.

Anyway, moving onto A Return to Salem's Lot, it was Cohen through and through, especially due to the presence of regular collaborator Michael Moriarty. Some things just go together. Peanut butter and jam. Rye and ginger. And Cohen and Moriarty. Apparently, this was shot back-to-back with It's Alive III so everything worked out well, didn't it?


Anchored by Moriarty, Return has everything else you would expect from a Cohen joint, including foul-mouthed children, quirky characters (including a Nazi hunter played by famed director Sam Fuller) and random creature effects. It also didn't hurt Cohen had the immeasurable talents of cinematographer Daniel Pearl – who coincidentally also shot Hooper's 1974 masterpiece – at his disposal.


Return's script was written by Cohen himself and though it has no real connection to King's work whatsoever – Barlow does not even appear in the movie despite the cover box – it did present some interesting story threads, most intriguingly the idea of the vampires wanting their existence to be documented by Moriarty's character. It also took me a few scenes to recognize a super young Tara Reid in her first role.

Tara Reid in A Return to Salem's Lot.

I still regard Cohen's New York stories to be his best works, but A Return to Salem's Lot was still an entertaining venture made just before he shifted his focus to screenwriting.

Friday, April 5, 2019

Mangled!


With the latest iteration of Pet Sematary in theatres, I decided to watch an old Stephen King ditty I'd been meaning to revisit, Tobe Hooper's The Mangler from 1995.


After several fatalities involving an old laundry pressing machine, grizzled cop Hunton (Ted Levine) begins to suspect it may be possessed by evil.

I watched this when it came out in theatres and remembered liking it, but oh my did this not hold up as well as I thought it might. First off, just from the title graphic alone, The Mangler had direct-to-video written all over it. It's amazing some of the horror movies that got a wide release back in the nineties, but, to be fair, the trio of King, Hooper & Robert Englund does carry a large amount of cache. And considering it was largely shot in South Africa, I can't imagine it cost a lot to make either. But I digress.


Perhaps not surprisingly, the most striking thing about this movie was The Mangler itself. Apparently designed by Hooper's own son, William, it's a truly menacing piece of machinery, right down to the sound design. It's also fortunate that the movie at least delivered on its promise of crushing and folding more than a few people like so much laundry. I was little sad that the icebox scene was not nearly as outrageous as I remembered it. Dang recall!

Everything aside from the machine eating people was kind of a mess... Okay, a different kind of mess. I remembered Englund's performance as the machine's owner being a tad cartoonish, but holy mothballs! I feel like Englund asked Hooper on day one, “so how far do you want me to take this?” and he was like, “take Lefty & Chop Top from Texas 2 and crank it to eleven”.


To be honest though, apart from the occasional off-kilter camera angle, I felt there was a lack of direction from Hooper, most apparent during the meandering exchanges between Hunton and his worldly brother-in-law Mark (Daniel Matmor). It was like they were improving half of their scenes together with only an end point to guide them. It's bitter sweet because it made for some amusing moments (in a wow-what-is-going-on kind of way), but it's not the most concise way to make a movie.


I had clearly blanked out the climax because I did not recall that it unfortunately goes the route of almost every King adaptation of the nineties, falling back on instantly regrettable visual effects. Mercifully, they were kept to a minimum with the use of shadow and quick cuts though. The Mangler came at the tail end of an era that saw King properties appear at an almost monthly pace and though it's by no means the worst, it was far from its well-oiled namesake.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Eyesore Haul

There was a VHS swap meet down at the ol' Eyesore Cinema this weekend and here is the resulting booty.


Looking forward to digging into these over the next few months. Been a long time since I watched The Mangler, but my memories of it are quite fond. I mean, you really haven't lived until you've seen Ted Levine get attacked by an icebox.

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Short of the Week #37: N

It was Stephen King's seventy-first birthday last Friday. I wanted to celebrate by posting one of his dollar babies, but unfortunately none of the good ones I've seen recently (Robin Kasparik's I Am The Doorway or Julien Homsy's Popsy for instance) are online yet. In their absence, I'm embedding the motion comic series for N from 2013. Enjoy!



Thursday, September 20, 2018

redruM

Hey all. Since ceasing my Don't Kill the Messenger weeklies, I don't really post about cool stuff on the Net anymore, but I couldn't pass this one up. Here's the new video from Australian artist Pogo aka Nick Bertke where he makes music with sounds from Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of The Shining.



I've literally watched this thing a dozen times since I discovered it last week. I wish I had the equipment/time/inspiration to do shit like this. For more of Pogo's videos, check out his YT channel here.

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Short of the Week #35: Harvey's Dream

With Castle Rock now well into his first season, I thought I'd post of my favourite Stephen King dollar baby short films, Alex Von Hoffman's Harvey's Dream.



Harvey's Dream first appeared in The New Yorker in 2003 and later included in his collection Just After Sunset. If you are not aware of the term Dollar Baby, Stephen King notoriously grants permission to adapt his short works at the cost of one dollar. There have been dozens, perhaps hundreds of these by now, and Hoffman's (since I discovered it while screening shorts last year) version still chills me to the bone.

Friday, December 29, 2017

Best Horror of 2017

I have a vision of now-me shaking my head at Xmas 2016-me when I was saying we were glad to see the end of that year, as if to say wait until you see the garbage pile that was 2017. Not for me personally of course for despite a hiccup in the summer, my year was decent. I premiered a new short at Toronto After Dark, finally got my foot in the door at Rue Morgue and picked up a new (now my fourth) programming gig - but more on that later.


In between all that I saw some movies. Here below are the five standouts.

Canada/USA, Dir: Guillermo del Toro

Though I suppose not technically horror, this was my favourite film this year period so I'm putting it front & center. I've said it many times before, but this movie is magical. I feel this is the unabated vision that del Toro has been leading up to his entire career. And it's timely. We needed this film. In late 2001, Amelie was released right when it felt the world was fractured beyond repair. The Shape of Water possesses that kind of whimsical healing power. Maybe I'm being melodramatic, but after months of being hoofed in the crotch every time I opened my social media feeds, del Toro's opus reminded me how much cinema can shine against the darkness.

USA, Dir: Jordan Peele

And speaking of important films, there is Peele's masterful debut. Get Out is one of those rare pieces that continues to reveal hidden layers upon repeated viewings, even just the small things like the separation of milk & cereal and how the protagonist literally picks cotton to save himself. The horror genre turned a corner when revolutionaries like Romero, Craven and Hooper used the forum for social commentary and this practice still continues to be as powerful as it ever was. However, it goes even deeper than that, as Peele has a true command of the visual and audio aspects of the medium, as well. This film is a triumph.

USA, Dir: Mike Flanagan

In a year that saw many Stephen King works brought to the large and small screens - with mixed results - this was the cream of the crop. Long considered unfilmable, Flanagan did the impossible by not only doing it, but doing it well. I still maintain that this is the purest King adaptation to date. Brilliantly skirting the issues that long stymied its production, Flanagan hired two of the best character actors working today (Carla Gugino & Bruce Greenwood) and let them do their thing. I think it is now safe to say that Flanagan is the most consistent journeyman working in the genre today.

USA, Dir: M. Night Shyamalan

No one is surprised more than me that M. Night made my list this year. Not only did he serve up a solid thriller with terrific performances by James McAvoy & Anya Taylor-Joy, he also managed to drop one hell of a bombshell at the eleventh hour. It's amazing to me that he was able to erase his erroneous past by just connecting Split with 2000's Unbreakable. It was like I entered an alternate universe where everything from the last act of Signs onwards never existed. Superhero cinematic universes are chock-a-block now, but it can be argued that M. Night was one of the first to attempt it.

Germany, Dir: Stefan Ruzowitzky

The best film I saw at Fantasia this year, Cold Hell was a return to form from the director of Anatomy. With DNA that is the closest thing to a giallo I've seen in quite sometime, this film is bursting with kinetic energy that had me shadow boxing afterwards. I loved the character of Özge, deftly brought to life by Violetta Schurawlow, who despite constantly being in peril never let herself be a victim.

Honourable Mentions

It was a terrific year for Canadian genre film in 2017. At the top of the pile was Seth A. Smith's The Crescent with its quiet, creeping dread and experimental visual palette. I was also very entertained by the in-your-face excesses of Sebastien Landry & Laurence Morais-Lagace's Game of Death and... as I was typing this I realized that Graham Skipper's Sequence Break is not Canadian - I guess the Videodrome with arcade games angle had me thinking it was - but hell I really dug that one too.

As with 2016, there were a lot of good genre docs, as well. I saw a pair of great ones at Fantasia in King Cohen and 78/52, but my fave this year was Rob Grant's “faux” doc Fake Blood. I think frequent horror documentaries may be here to stay and that fills me with cheer.

Lastly, I just want to bang the drum for Issa LĂłpez's Tigers Are Not Afraid. This is a stunning piece of work. I've seen it referred to as “the greatest film del Toro never made” and I can see that though I wager the feminine element is a large part of what makes this resonate as much as it does. After seeing The Shape of Water I thought to myself, “wow nothing is going to affect me emotionally as much as that did”. Then two months later I saw Tigers...

Now, for the chaff. I was fortunately much better at avoiding the garbage this year than I was last. However, that fucking Alien: Covenant, man... Life deserved much more praise over that, the characters were better, the effects were better and though they both had so-we-weren't-supposed-to-see-that-coming? endings, at least Life's was half as long. And it had one-hundred per cent less recorder.

Okay, that's it for features. I've decided that, since I've started seeing several hundred a year now, I'm going to do a short film wrap up so stay tuned for that tomorrow.

Monday, October 9, 2017

Deadly Games.

Soon after the film adaptation of Stephen King's infamous novel Gerald's Game dropped on Netflix, I eagerly queued it up.


A romantic getaway turns deadly when Jessie (Carlo Gugino) is left handcuffed to her bed when her husband dies (Bruce Greenwood) during some kinky role play.

I was pleasantly surprised by how well Gerald's Game turned out. Director Mike Flanagan's interpretation was excellent and I would go so far as to say that it's one of the purest King adaptations out there. It's been donkey's years since I've read the book, but from what I recall everything was left intact, yet nicely condensed to fit a one-hundred minute running time. He even kept in the references to King's other works like Dolores Claiborne and the pervasive Dark Tower in addition to some throwaway lines about Cujo and Bag of Bones that made me chuckle. Though with all these connections, I was puzzled why they relocated the story from Maine to Louisiana.

Most impressive was how effortlessly Flanagan put this onscreen when you take into account that this book was long considered unfilmable. How can film a movie where the main character is nude throughout the whole thing? And more challenging, how can you film a movie where she spends most of it in her own head? Well, the solutions to both were actually pretty simple, it just took a talented problem solver like Flanagan to figure them out. First, don't have her be naked and second, externalize her inner voices into physical form. I thought this worked really well and felt much more organic than the device used in last year's 11/22/63. In that one, the filmmakers expanded a bit player for the protagonist to play off, but by doing so increasingly veered from the subject matter. In Gerald's Game, these tangible manifestations fully visualized the core of the piece.

Carla Gugino as Jessie in Gerald's Game.

Additionally, I really appreciated that there were no important compromises made. Jessie's revelation halfway through the movie was just as uncomfortable to watch as it was to read and though the epilogue may have been creepier on the page, it still needed to be there. I was also taken aback by the cringe-worthy gore at the climax. It really went from zero to sixty in a matter of seconds.

Flanagan aside, I really have to commend Carlo Gugino. I praised the perfect casting when I heard she was attached, but she really delivered here. Both her & Bruce Greenwood were fantastic and brought the characters to life. It had been a while since I'd seen Henry Thomas too – and to be honest I wish it was under less sleazy circumstances. Gerald's Game was really top notch from A to Z.


I think Flanagan has cemented himself as the premiere genre director working today. He has a string of strong indies and has now proved that he can kill it with other people's material. Shit, I might even have to check out his next Netflix project, a miniseries based on The Haunting of Hill House, also starring Gugino (Theodora?!) How can I not at this point?

Monday, September 11, 2017

You'll Float Too!

Before I get into my TIFF coverage, there is something else I must talk about. This weekend I saw the much anticipated release of Andy Muschetti's new version of Stephen King's It.


I came around to the idea of this adaptation after I saw the first trailer. I realized that there were a lot of things that could be improved upon from the 1990 mini-series so I gave it a chance. I'm very glad I did. Director Muschietti did an exemplary job. After his previous film Mama, we already knew he had a knack for set pieces and getting solid performances from young actors, but he took it to another level with It.

However, from day one, it was evident that this film would live or die on the portrayal of Pennywise the Dancing Clown and Bill SkarsgÄrd really nailed it. He didn't try to ape Tim Curry's version, but rather used his own energy. I absolutely loved the physicality he brought to this role. He looked like he was literally drinking the fear coming off his victims.

Bill SkarsgÄrd as Pennywise the clown in It.

Apart from Pennywise though, it was super impressive to me that Muschietti was able to assemble such a wonderful cast of eight young kids that could not only act, but also gel together as well as they did here. They were all great, especially Sophie Lillis & Jack Dylan Fraser who played Beverly & Eddie. Lillis gave a wonderfully layered performance and Fraser had this unique vibe that really made him stand out.

It's widely accepted that the downfall of Mama came from its over-reliance on CGI and Muschietti has mostly learned his lesson from that. While It did employ substantial visual effects, a lot of them were used in really creative ways. I feel like they utilized many different techniques, some of them so abstract my brain had trouble latching onto them - the lady in the painting and the headless figure in the library in particular were two real standouts for me.

The Loser's Club 2017

Looking back on It, I can recall so many solid set pieces. In the first half of the movie, the sheer volume of them was almost exhausting. Muschietti employed a modern jump scare formula, but he seems to have a better handle on it than most of his contemporaries. He knows when to pull back, before you fall over the precipice of desensitization. He also had the right amount of restraint on his eighties fan service. It was set then, but didn't overly ram the decade down our throats as much as Stranger Things tends to.

Another layer that I found really enticing – and this could very well be cribbed from the book – was the characterization of the town of Derry itself. I felt there was this underlying thread that the townspeople were complacent that this evil shit was just going to happen every quarter century and they just hoped it wasn't their kid that got snatched. It would explain why Eddie's mother tried to keep him sheltered from the outside world.


It was a top tier King adaptation with a measure of darkness very few have had. It always seemed to me that his vision has often obscured while on its way to the screen, either by the team at the helm or, in the case of almost all of his small screen ventures, restrained from its full potential. It felt much more like the adaptation glory years from 1976 to 1984.

I think It will take a lot of people by surprise. The previous teleplay had a very playful predilection to it that this one does not. Sure, there's the jovial shit-talking among The Loser's Club, but once It appeared well... It's like I exclaimed after the opening SS Georgie scene – “These guys aren't fucking around.”

Sunday, April 23, 2017

DKTM 337


Hey all. I hope your weekend is going fine. Here's some great bits of news to wash down your brunch.

Stephen King Spotified.

The artist known as Butcher Billy unleashed these awesome pieces on the world last week. In his own words, he explains, “this series imagines an alternate universe in which some of the most hopeless, desperate and tragic heartbreak songs of the 70's and 80's were actually novels written by Stephen King.”







For the rest of the series, click here.

Friday the 26th.

Gun Media posted an update video for their hotly anticipated video game Friday the 13th, in which our boy Voorhees slashes his way across the screen to tell us he will arrive March 26th.



Very much looking forward to grabbing a bunch of friends around the fire and playing this.

A Look Back/Forward.

Showtime released a two-minute recap of Twin Peaks recently. I can't imagine anyone would be watching this who hasn't seen the show, but just in case spoilers be thine.



I'm so stoked that the lore of the Black Lodge will be continued here. Twin Peaks returns May 21st.